Percikan pikiran seorang ekonom.


Aris  Ananta

Mletiko, 25 January, 2013

The word “demographic transition’ was first coined by a French demographer, Adolphe Landry, in the seminal publication  La Revolution Demographique, published in 1934. The theory of demographic transition was then reformulated  by an American demographer, Frank W. Notestein during 1945-1953. Kingsley David joined this work in establishing the foundation of the theory of demographic transition.

In essence, the theory of demographic transition attempts to describe a general pattern of demographic changes a country may experience. It states that initially a country experiences a level of demographic equilibrium (with very low population growth or no growth at all) because of both high fertility and mortality rates. Then, mortality and fertility decline. Finally, mortality and fertility will be very low. Again, at this stage, population growth is very low. This process, from high fertility and mortality rates to low fertility and mortality rates,  is  called as the demographic transition.

The real process may not be as smooth as described by this theory. Critics say that this is not a theory since it does not provide any sufficient explanation for the causes of the transition. Some say that “demographic transition” may not be a “theory”, but it is a way to describe demographic changes because of declining fertility and mortality rates.

One  weakness of this “demographic transition” is that it has not discussed change in population mobility. Then, in 1970s  Zelinsky  examined stages of internal population mobility (mobility within a country).  Skeldon in 1990  improved Zelinsky’s concept. However, both Zelinsky and Skeldon only briefly examined international population mobility and its connection with the stages of internal population mobility. Others, such as Stahl and Appleyard, in 1990s,  developed a separate theory of  stages of international population mobility. This framework relates changes in international population mobility to international movement of capital. It is unfortunate that there has been no  result of putting the demographic transition, internal population mobility transition, and international population mobility transition into one unifying framework.

Meanwhile, in 1980s, Van de Kaa  created another terminology “the second demographic transition”. He refers the “demographic transition” pioneered by Landry and reformulated by Notestein and David, the one we usually hear,  as “the first demographic transition”. Van De Kaa described  replacement level fertility and mortality (with TFR at about 2.1) as the end of the first demographic transition. After that, when fertility and mortality levels are below replacement level, the population is in the second demographic transition. Fertility level is usually fluctuating.  During this period, there will be new norms regarding individual behaviour and family. Social norm will shift to the appreciation of individual aspiration and needs.

At the national level, Indonesia almost completes the first demographic transition. But, some provinces have completed the first demographic transition and have been in the second demographic transition.

During the second demographic transition, with an intense inter-relationship between ageing and migration, we have the another  demographic transition. Colement (2006) called this as the “third demographic transition”.  This is related to a fast change in ethnic composition because of rising population mobility, particularly the inflow of different ethnic and religious groups. The fast change in ethnic composition in a given population may create social, economic, and political conflicts.   Indonesia has seen this phenomenon too. *



Filed under: Demography, English, international migration, migration, statistics,

Indonesia’s Population Explosion: no longer an issue

An Effective Family Planning  Scheme Has Done Its Job

Aris  Ananta

For  ASIA  SENTINEL,  8  July 2011

A 40-year-old West Java villager who goes by the single name Deni has
only two children, a considerable change from his own parents. He has
seven siblings. He thus illustrates the change that has taken place
over the last four decades in Indonesia as the country’s family
planning program and changing cultural mores have caused birth rates
to fall dramatically. Read the rest of this entry »

Filed under: Demography, economy, English, , , , , , , ,

Which Ethnic Group is Ageing Faster?

Aris Ananta,  Evi Nurvidya Arifin, and Bakhtiar

Indonesia is a multi-ethnic country. Joining many other countries, Indonesia’s population is ageing.  “Ethnicity and Ageing in Indonesia, 2000-2050” examines and projects the dynamics of ageing in the five largest ethnic groups in Indonesia.

Indonesia as a whole has been undergoing its second demographic transition since 2000-2005 and opened the demographic window of opportunity in 2005.  However, the timing of the two events is very different in each ethnic group.

The differences may necessitate different ageing policies. If not managed wisely, they could result in ethnic conflicts, especially if Indonesia follows the slower decline fertility scenario.

The paper projects the timing of the demographic window of opportunity and second demographic transition for each of the five ethnic groups. It utilizes the 2000 population census data set—the first census/survey to collect information on ethnicity since the 1930 census.

Full article is published at Asian Population Studies, Volume 1, Issue 2 July 2005 , pages 227 – 243.

Filed under: ageing, English, , , ,

This site contains the writings of Aris Ananta & Evi Nurvidya Arifin. Click here to find out more about them.

We are researchers in the field of demography, social and economic statistics, and economics, focusing on Indonesia and Southeast Asia. Click here to find out more about OUR PUBLICATION .<br

Our research interest is the intersection of:




  • 141,475

Our Books

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 93 other followers