September 28, 2008 • 4:03 pm
“mletiko” comes from the verb “mletik”, a Javanese word that means something close to “sparkle”. Mletik, however, is a very brief spark just like when we ignite a match. If it is not caught immediately, it will die.
Mletiko then means to mletik – to spark ideas. I hope this blog can mletik everybody who reads it. Yet, readers must be cautioned. To mletik will not necessarily make us happy. When we mletik, we catch fire and with this light we may see the surrounding a little better. However, a better understanding of our surrounding may make us frustrated and angry. It really depends on how we perceive pe-mletik-an.
A good English synonym for pemletikan is enlightenment. I would say, however, that enlightenment is deeper than pemletikan. Enlightenment is more spiritual, but here, in this blog, it is simply an intellectual process.
I love economic analyses, tools to choose whenever we have scarcity. The issues are not necessarily related to “money”. I may cover “cultural” and “political” issues. I am also a demographer, working with statistics on population dynamics as well as its wide social, economic, and political determinants and implications. Southeast Asia, particularly Indonesia, is my main research interest.
Selamat Mletik, Happy Mletik.
Aris Ananta (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Filed under: Uncategorized, mletiko
September 26, 2016 • 6:28 pm
Just Published on line
Evi Nuvidya Arifin, M. Sairi Hasbullah, and Agus Pramono. “Chinese Indonesians: How Many and Where”, Asian Ethnicity, 2016, on-line.
This paper provides new statistics to the debate on percentage of Chinese Indonesians, using the latest 100% data set of the 2010 population census. It reveals that the statistics is closer to the low side of the debate, less than 2.0%, rather than the high side of 3.0% and more. Ethnicity is here self-defined by the respondents. With 1.2%, the Chinese Indonesians ranked as the 15th largest group of more than 600 ethnic groups. This paper also produces statistics at the district level, the first ever statistics on Chinese Indonesians. It finds that some provinces and districts have large percentages of Chinese Indonesians, but the respective total population are relatively small to the total Indonesia’s population. Majority of provinces and districts (25 out of 33 provinces and 415 out of 497 districts) have lower percentage of Chinese than the national figure.
Filed under: Demography, English, Ethnic Diversity, Indonesia, Statistics, Ethnicity, Uncategorized, Chinese
August 28, 2016 • 3:15 pm
28 Agustus 2016
Tidak sehat tak apa apa, karena ekonomi justru terus tumbuh dengan baik. Merokoklah. Jangan kuatir bahwa anda, pasangan anda, keluarga anda, teman anda dan orang lain akan sakit dan sakit sakitan. Ini adalah pengorbanan anda semua demi pertumbuhan ekonomi. Tetapi, siapkah anda menjadi sakit dan sakitan sambil nonton pertumbuhan ekonomi yang menakjubkan? Itu kah yang anda inginkan dari pembangunan ekonomi? Read the rest of this entry »
Filed under: Bahasa Indonesia, economy, Uncategorized, Rokok, sakit, sustainable development
August 27, 2016 • 4:41 pm
Pembaca yang budiman,
Merokoklah terus. Sakit dan sakitan tidak apa apa. Anda akan membantu pertumbuhan ekonomi. Demi kesejahteraan industri rokok kita diminta terus merokok. Jangan risaukan sakit dan sakit sakitan, anda pahlawan ekonomi.
Lucu ya? Semoga anda tidak mau menjadi pahlawan ekonomi seperti ini. Kasihanilah diri anda sendiri, pasangan anda, keluarga anda, dan masyarakat Indonesia.
Yuk, kita semua mengikuti gaya hidup sehat. Demi kesejahteraan kita semua. Selain itu, ada bonusnya. Kalau kita sehat, ekonomi akan tumbuh dengan berkelanjutan. Kalau kita sakit sakitan, kita akan mengalami bencana demografi. Produktifitas turun drastis dan ekonomi juga akan berantakan.
Salam hidup sehat.
Filed under: Bahasa Indonesia, Demography, economy, Uncategorized, pertumbuhan ekonomi, Rokok, sakit
13 Juli 2016
Pembaca yang budiman,
Barusan saya membaca berita, pemerintah DKI hendak mengembalikan hak pejalan kaki dan penyandang disabilitas. Selama ini, pejalan kaki tidak mempunyai hak berjalan sama sekali. Bukan hanya di Jakarta, di kota kecil pun demikian. Bahkan di lorong lorong kecil, sepeda motor telah merampas hak orang untuk berjalan kaki.
Semoga rencana pemerintah DKI berjalan dengan lancar. Orang dapat berjalan kaki. Jalan kaki murah, menyehatkan, tidak mengotori lingkungan dengan hemat energi. Silakan baca berita berikut ini. Click di sini.
Mari kita dukung program ini.
Filed under: Uncategorized
11 July 2016
This is a just published paper on ethnicity in Indonesia, Asia & the Paciﬁc Policy Studies, 27 June 2016. doi: 10.1002/app5.143.
This paper aims to quantitatively uncover ethnic diversity in multi-ethnic Land of Papua, an Indonesian region with a large inﬂow of migration and rising ethno-based movement, consisting of the Provinces of Papua and West Papua. It produces statistics on ethnic diversity in the Land of Papua, utilizing the tabulation provided by Statistics-Indonesia based on the raw, 100 per cent, data set of the 2010 population census. It uses three measurements of ethnic diversity. First is ethnic fractionalization index, showing the degree of ethnic heterogeneity. Second is ethnic polarization index, examining the existence of few relatively large ethnic groups of almost the samesizes.Third is a comparison of percentages between migrant and Papuan groups. It ﬁnds that the Land of Papua is ethnically very heterogeneous, but not polarized. West Papua is more heterogeneous, but Papua is more polarized. However, seen from a dichotomy between migrants and Papuans, West Papua is very polarized. In-migration may have increased the probability of having ethnic conﬂicts in the region but does not change the probability of the intensity of the conﬂicts. Therefore, ethnic conﬂicts should be anticipated whenever making programmes that involve in-migrants or entice people to migrate into the Land of Papua.
Dowload here for the full paper of Statistics on Ethnicity in the Land of Papua.
Filed under: Demography, English, Ethnic Diversity, Indonesia, Statistics, conflict, migration, Papua, West Papua
14 June 2016
I just have a new publication, on the demography of SIJORI (Singapore – Johor – Province of Riau Island), entitled “The Population of the SIJORI Cross-Bordern Region”. It is Chapter 2 in The SIJORI Cross-Border Regions: Trans national Political, Economics, and Culture. Edited by Francis E. Hutchinson and Terence Chong. Singapore: ISEAS – Yushof Ishak Institute, 2016.
More details are referred to here.
Filed under: Demography, English, Kepulauan Riau, Johor, Singapore, migration, statistics
February 6, 2016 • 4:59 pm
As we continue working on ethnicity in Indonesia, we have just published a journal article, “Declining Dominance of an Ethnic Group in a Large Multi-Ethnic Developing Country: the Case of the Javanese in Indonesia”, Population Review, volume 55, number 1, 2016, pp. 1-26, written by Aris Ananta, Dwi Retno Wilujeng Wahyu Utama, and Ari Purbowati.
Here is the abstract
Indonesia is undergoing a third demographic transition that features changes in ethnic composition. We examine quantitatively the extent and change of dominance of the Javanese, who have experienced below replacement fertility. As used herein, an ethnic group is said to be dominant if it is the largest ethnic group and its percentage is at least twice the percentage of the second largest ethnic group. The Javanese are the largest, most ubiquitous and politically important ethnic group in Indonesia. This quantitative analysis addresses the ethnic dominance and cultural hegemony literature. We question the ubiquity of the Javanese – who represent the process of Javanization – because Indonesia’s Javanese character/culture may be eroding. We find that among the Javanese living outside their three home provinces, the percentage of those who speak Javanese daily at home is very low. These Javanese may have adapted to local conditions. We also find that the Javanese are not always the dominant or even the largest ethnic group. In most of the districts, they comprise a very small minority ethnic group.
An important finding is that the “third demographic transition” has been and continues to be occurring in Indonesia, a large developing country. Our findings expand the original concept of what constitutes a third demographic transition, which has been applied previously only to developed countries. We conclude that the Javanese are still dominant, but their dominance has declined, and that a third demographic transition is taking place in Indonesia.
Filed under: Demography, English, Ethnic Diversity, Indonesia, Statistics, Ethnicity, Large Population, statistics, Dominant Ethnic Group, Indonesia, Javanese